High-risk pregnancies rising in U.S.

By Marilynn Marchione, ASSOCIATED PRESS

Tools

By Beth Boehne

(AP) — High-risk pregnancies are on the rise in the United States and may be more common now than at any other time since modern obstetric care became available.

Why? More fortysomething moms are having babies, and epidemics of diabetes, obesity and high blood pressure are causing pregnancy and birth complications.

But in this otherwise troubling trend is also some good news: A small but growing number of women are successfully having children despite life-threatening conditions that once made a safe pregnancy almost inconceivable.

Exact numbers are not available, but doctors say that tens of thousands of organ transplant recipients, breast cancer survivors, women with heart defects, and even women with the AIDS virus have decided to risk childbearing in the last several years.

Not all of these stories have happy endings, and many people worry that some of these women will not live long enough to raise their children, or that they will pass on their medical problems.

But most results have been so surprisingly good that they are overturning decades of gloomy dogma about who is medically fit to have a child.

“These people define a whole new era of pregnancy for us,” said Temple University's Dr. Vincent Armenti, who runs a registry that tracks births to transplant patients.

“We have to change our mindset about the perfect pregnancy,” he said. Women should be given advice based on solid research “instead of an emotional feeling that some people just shouldn't have a baby.”

No one knows precisely how many high-risk pregnancies there are. It is a catchall term that in the past has meant the mom is over 35 or has a condition like high blood pressure that is dangerous for her or her fetus. But as these situations have become more common, even this loose definition is changing.

Births to women 35 and older are soaring. And many complications are becoming so routine that nurse midwives can manage them instead of sending women to high-risk care specialists. Doctors around the country say they are treating far more of these risky cases than they did a decade ago.

“Patients are getting older, so by definition, they're higher-risk. The diabetes rate is going through the roof, so that's high-risk. More people with high blood pressure are getting pregnant. The list goes on and on,” leaving fewer women considered low-risk, said Dr. Jacques Moritz, director of gynecology at Roosevelt Hospital in New York City.

Dr. Mary D'Alton, the Columbia University Medical Center obstetrics chief who recently delivered twins to a 59-year-old woman, has replaced the term “high-risk” with a 1-to-10 scale.

Birth outcomes for older women and those with medical problems “have been better than we would expect,” although complications are more common, she said. For example, about half of organ transplant recipients give birth prematurely, although often by just a couple of weeks. “I don't mean to paint a rosy picture, but I would want to paint an optimistic picture,” D'Alton said.

Dr. Gabrielle Fish felt optimistic when she decided to try pregnancy after her kidney transplant. Fish, of Cherry Hill, N.J., was in her mid-30s and had been stable on her anti-rejection drugs for two years. After researching pregnancies among transplant patients – there have been more than 1,000 in the last decade – she asked her doctors' advice.

“They pretty much encouraged me. They said, 'You're a healthy woman and you don't want to wait till you're high-risk because of your age,'” Fish said.

The result: a healthy daughter, Madelyn, now 6. Fish said she feels lucky to have her, but would not try to have a second child.

Carla Taylor also feels lucky. A delivery room nurse from New York, she was 42 when she discovered she was pregnant after having artery embolization to treat uterine fibroids. Such women are advised not to try pregnancy because the treatment plugs blood vessels that feed fibroids, and that might keep a fetus from growing properly.

Taylor had a healthy daughter, Bailey, now 6. Moritz, the gynecology director who works with Taylor at Roosevelt Hospital, said 16 of his patients have unexpectedly had children after the fibroid treatment and most have done well.

“Usually if they were able to get pregnant after the embolization, it means that blood supply to the uterus is pretty good,” he said. Doctors expect more of these cases as embolization becomes a popular option to hysterectomy for fibroids, which plague millions of women.

Other reasons high-risk pregnancies are increasing:

  • Older moms. In 2005, there were more than 104,000 births in the United States to women ages 40 through 44, and over 6,500 to women 45 and older. Advanced age raises the risk of birth defects.

  • Chronic health problems. Obesity among women ages 18 to 44 rose from under 9 percent in 1990 to almost 22 percent in 2005.

    Hospital admissions for diabetes or related conditions among pregnant women and new mothers rose from 175,655 in 1993 to 269,861 in 2004, says the March of Dimes. Admissions for high blood pressure rose from 260,222 to 403,271.

  • Multiple births, often the result of infertility treatment. In 2004, they made up more than 3 percent of all live births, up from about 2 percent in 1980. Such babies are more likely to be born prematurely and to have health problems.

  • More cancer survivors. Hundreds of thousands are in their prime childbearing years.

    “Pregnancy raises enormous concerns for women with a history of breast cancer because we know that many breast cancers are hormonally driven,” and high estrogen levels during pregnancy might raise the risk of relapse, said Julia Rowland, director of the National Cancer Institute's Office of Cancer Survivorship. “They may also be concerned that they may not be here for a child.”

  • Better medical care. Women with congenital heart defects used to die young. Those who lived were urged not to get pregnant. Now many such defects can be fixed, and children of women with heart defects are having their own children.

  • More drugs. Nearly two-thirds of women who gave birth from 1996-2000 took a medication during pregnancy, a large federally funded study found. Of those, nearly 40 percent took a drug whose safety in pregnancy is not established, and nearly 5 percent took a drug potentially risky to the fetus. More pregnant women have taken new medicines for cancer, depression and other problems. More than 30 registries now track outcomes of pregnant women on various drugs.

  • Growing prevalence of HIV. Each year, about 6,000 to 7,000 HIV-infected American women give birth. Such pregnancies have been controversial because of the risk of spreading the virus to their babies. But modern AIDS drugs are so effective at protecting babies from the virus' spread that more doctors are accepting these women's choice to have children.

    “I view HIV disease now as basically a chronic illness,” said Dr. Nancy Chescheir, obstetrics chief at Vanderbilt Medical Center. Despite several hundred births to infected moms at Vanderbilt, “we haven't had an HIV transmission in six years,” she said.

    D'Alton, the Columbia obstetrics chief, agreed.

    “I just feel that these are very personal choices,” she said. D'Alton sees her job as giving good care and supporting those choices “as much as possible.”

  • Saturday, Apr 26 at 5:05 PM tammy ingling wrote ...

    i think david ingling is funny that he did not think about adding is own kids age's in his letters and yes i am the 25 year old he is talk about but what i do not understand is why did he not say that he has children by another marrage so my dad has 4 daughter"s and 2 son's but i think they do not matter at all and he does not call or see anyone anymore eacape the 23 year old and the 2 1/2 year old and that is sad very sad.

    Flag for moderation

    Monday, Mar 3 at 7:58 AM anonymous wrote ...

    Women have been having children in their 40's since time began. Why is this even a question? This is really normal. The only reason I see this is a question is our society is obsessed with the parent's decision to have a baby or not in modern times. Babies ARE a gift from God as they always have been no matter what happens. The mom's I know who have babies in their 40's are wonderful mom's and the kids are doing great!Why should another person's opinion become the end all for others? MYOB

    Flag for moderation

    Sunday, Mar 2 at 7:07 PM as wrote ...

    As a professional female doctor I had to put off having children due to my career. Where as my male counterparts did not have to worry about being pregant during their residency program or starting a practice. I now have two wonderful girls and I would not trade it for the world.

    Flag for moderation

    Sunday, Mar 2 at 5:18 PM Anonymous wrote ...

    I think every child deserves to be wanted and loved regardless the age of the parents.

    Flag for moderation

    Sunday, Mar 2 at 10:37 AM chad wrote ...

    i am sure it is easier with the financial end of things but iv seen a lot of older parents that cant join their kids in sports and such due to getting up in age and just not able to be as active

    Flag for moderation

    Saturday, Mar 1 at 9:10 AM Alicia wrote ...

    People who start thier families at a later age do have a secure and stable enviroment then someone younger. As long as the parents aren't past the 40 age and still capable of raising thier children to thier 2o's.

    Flag for moderation

    Saturday, Mar 1 at 8:48 AM Cindy wrote ...

    My mother had me at 40 years old and my sister when she was almost 42 years old and we were both health. I am now pregnant at 39 years old and this is my second child and he is going to be a health boy despite the fact that I am diabetic. It is sometimes more conveniece today to have children later and I even though my mother and I did have problems with different issues because of age differences growing up and now she is a great mom.

    Flag for moderation

    Friday, Feb 29 at 6:55 PM David Ingling wrote ...

    My wife gave birth to our daughter at the age of 51. Our daughter is an exceptionally bright and loving child and we are able to give her the time and attention [I'm retired} that we were never able to give our other children, aged 23 and 25. My wife carried the baby better than most 20 year olds, her obstetritians words. She worked the day before she delivered, and as an aside she is still breast feeding [our daughter is 2yrs 9mths] She and the baby are in excellent health.

    Flag for moderation

    Friday, Feb 29 at 6:00 PM Jan Keen wrote ...

    I was against it till one of my friends just lost her one and only child this weekent. I hope she'll have more children.

    Flag for moderation

    Friday, Feb 29 at 5:55 PM Bill wrote ...

    NOT GOOD for the kid !! when he is 10yo your 50 your to old

    Flag for moderation

    Friday, Feb 29 at 5:52 PM Shirley Johnson wrote ...

    I do not think it is fair to the child to have an old parent! I lived it. My mother looked like my grandmother by the time I was 13. Think of when you have a teen eager at 55. Good luck!

    Flag for moderation

    Friday, Feb 29 at 5:25 PM kjc wrote ...

    i was 41 when i found out i was to be a mom once again. my daughter is now 3 1/2 yrs old and she is awesome. i am a 3rd generation older mom and am proud of it.. grandma was 42, mom was 43 and i was 41. i have 22 yrs between my girls and they are the best thing that ever happened to me. when i had the 1st one i was to young and not able to spend the time with her like i would have liked. but then my second was born and i am able to spend quality time with her and would not change a thing.

    Flag for moderation

    Friday, Feb 29 at 12:37 PM rose wrote ...

    i think by the time you are 35 you know the risks and you are an adult, settled in life so go for it.

    Flag for moderation

    Friday, Feb 29 at 12:20 PM mjr wrote ...

    Babies are a gift from God. I feel you can have a baby at any age. I am 55 years old and never had children. I still would if that is God's will.

    Flag for moderation

    Add a comment

    Name:

    Comment: 500 Characters Left

    Comments are moderated and will not appear on this story until after they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

    WSBT and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

    More On Demand

    Stock Quotes

    This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

    Tonight On WSBTFull Schedule

    7.00
    Wheel of Fortune
    7.30
    Jeopardy!
    8.00
    Big Bang Theory
    8.30
    How I Met Your Mother
    9.00
    Two and a Half Men
    9.30
    Rules of Engagement
    10.00
    CSI: Miami
    11.00
    WSBT News
    11.35
    Late Show with David Letterman

    Question of The Day

    Are you using the U.S. Post Office less?

    E-mail your comments to us. We'll pick some to read during WSBT News.

    • Yes
    • No