Do-over Democratic primary could be run by state

By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN, AP Political Writer

Tools

By Beth Boehne

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Democratic party leaders are floating yet another idea for a do-over election to get Michigan's delegates seated at the Democratic National Convention.

The latest proposal would involve a state-run Democratic primary that would be held in May or June and would be paid for by Democratic donors.

Michigan and Florida were stripped of their Democratic delegates after they moved up their primaries to January. New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton won both states, but no delegates. Her rival, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, did not even appear on Michigan's ballot.

Now, the two states are trying to find a say to get their delegates seated.

Michigan Democratic leaders are considering having the state run a Democratic primary in late spring. The plan must get Republican lawmakers' approval and faces numerous other hurdles.

Despite the possible problems, four Michigan Democratic leaders uncommitted to any candidate plans to run the idea past the Obama and Clinton campaigns Thursday during separate talks. Democratic National Committee member Debbie Dingell, U.S. Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, U.S. Sen. Carl Levin and Ron Gettelfinger are in that group.

A party-run mail-in election also could be on the table. But state Sens. Tupac Hunter and Buzz Thomas, Detroiters who support Obama, said Wednesday they don't want a mail-in election because they're worried about possible fraud or that some voters will be disenfranchised.

They suggested splitting Michigan's 128 pledged delegates equally between Clinton and Obama, while letting the 28 superdelegates vote any way they chose. Clinton doesn't like that idea. She called Wednesday for either seating the delegates based on the primary results or holding another election.

If the Democrats decide to ask the state to run the primary, it wouldn't be paid for with public funds. The money would come from private Democratic donations, possibly through the state Democratic Party, which then would give the money to the state. But lawmakers would need to appropriate the money.

It is not immediately known how much a second primary election would cost.

Dingell was making calls Wednesday to legislative leaders and the secretary of state's office, which oversees elections.

But secretary of state spokeswoman Kelly Chesney said her office is not yet involved in any discussions.

"We have not received any indication that the Legislature would be interested in the state conducting another presidential primary," she said.

The state already has an election scheduled for May 6, but it's mostly for lightly attended school elections. Some of the more than 5,000 polling places in the state weren't even going to be opened.

All those polling sites likely will be needed if a Democratic primary is held, however. And then there's the question of printing the ballots. The primary would have to be on a separate ballot from any other elections, such as one to elect school board members, and time is running short to print ballots.

Then there's the issue of who would be allowed to vote in the primary. The Michigan Democratic and Republican parties will learn in two weeks if a federal judge will allow the secretary of state's office to give them lists of who voted in the January primary and which ballot — Democratic or Republican — they took.

Those lists would be used to keep anyone who voted in the Jan. 15 Republican primary — even if they were a Democrat or independent — from voting in the do-over Democratic election.

That could anger banned voters, especially since many voted in the GOP election because Clinton was the only major candidate on the Democratic ballot, making that race largely a beauty contest.

It's possible the Legislature could push the election date back to early June, but the contest must be held by June 10 for the results to count under DNC rules. Any bill moving the election to a different date would have to pass the Democrat-controlled House and the GOP-controlled Senate.

———

EDITOR's NOTE: Kathy Barks Hoffman heads the Lansing AP bureau and has covered Michigan politics since 1986.

———

On the Net:

Michigan Democratic Party: http://www.michigandems.com

Friday, Mar 14 at 10:17 AM Debbie Shelby Township wrote ...

You break the rules, you pay the consequences. What is this telling our future politicians? Not a good precident to set. It's just not fair to break rules and then come back and waste time and money to make things work out your way. Also, if the primary was earlier there were other candidates who would space the vote out. This is NOT a fair thing to do. These leaders of politics need to admit they were wrong and lose their delegates.

Thursday, Mar 13 at 9:39 AM ticked off niles mi wrote ...

i agree with rick the state broke the rules & now should have to live with their consequences but if the do-gooders win the battle-both names should be on the ballot

Wednesday, Mar 12 at 11:33 PM Chris from Seattle wrote ...

How can you call a redo electioin in florida and michigan legitimate and good for the party? Both states knew the rules going into the primaries and accepted the consequences of thier actions. It sends a disgraceful message to those indepents and republicans who might be wavering for whom to vote for. It is inapropriate to change the rules of this primary because you are unsatisfied with the results. Is this the direction that the democratic party will be taking?

Wednesday, Mar 12 at 8:23 PM Rick from Grand Rapids, Michigan wrote ...

Shame on the Michigan (and Florida) Democratic Party leaders for the mess they created by trying to BULLY their way to the front of the Primary Voting line! Michigan spent the taxpayers money on a meanless, unsanctioned Primary Vote, and now the Billary Machine wants to count it anyway. Michigan and Florida should both be held accountable for their actions, and not have any delegates seated at the Convention...PERIOD!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

Comments are moderated and will not appear on this story until after they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

WSBT and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

WSBT Weather

icon
78
°
More Weather
More On Demand

Stock Quotes

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Tonight On WSBTFull Schedule

7.00
Wheel of Fortune
7.30
Jeopardy!
8.00
Greatest American Dog
9.00
CSI
10.00
Flashpoint
11.00
WSBT News
11.35
Late Show with David Letterman

Question of The Day

What is your reaction to the verdict in the Kathy Phillips trial?

E-mail your comments to us. We'll pick some to read during WSBT News at 5:30.