Debate stakes higher for McCain; insults mount

By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer

Tools

By Beth Boehne

WASHINGTON (AP) — Running short on time, John McCain has the most riding on the second presidential debate, though Barack Obama will be out of his scripted comfort zone in the town hall-style confrontation. It could be ugly if Monday's tussling is any indication.

Tuesday night's debate comes exactly four weeks before Election Day with a lot going on both inside and outside the campaign: Polling shows Obama approaching the 270 Electoral College votes needed for victory, Wall Street is tumbling even further and both candidates are escalating character attacks.

Their target audience in the debate: the roughly 10 percent of the electorate who are undecided and an additional quarter who say they might still change their minds before Nov. 4.

The debate, at Belmont University in Nashville, Tenn., is supposed to be divided equally between the economy and foreign policy, but given the global financial turmoil, economic questions may well dominate. As markets were plunging in Europe and Asia as well as the U.S. on Monday, the candidates were going after each other.

In Florida, GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin raised Obama's ties to 1960s-era radical William Ayers and to the Democrat's former pastor, the incendiary Rev. Jeremiah Wright. In New Mexico, McCain, himself asked, "Who is the real Senator Obama," referred to him critically as a "Chicago politician" and argued that the Democrat says one thing and does another.

Obama, in turn, asserted in North Carolina that McCain was engaging "in the usual political shenanigans and smear tactics" to distract from economic issues, even as his own aides in Chicago assailed the Republican nominee for "an angry tirade" and went after him for his role in the 1980s Keating Five savings and loan scandal.

McCain, a four-term Arizona senator, is trailing in polls and facing dwindling options to thwart Democrat Obama in an enormously troublesome political landscape for Republicans. Obama, the first-term Illinois senator, wants to solidify his lead and avoid any major debate misstep that could set him back in his quest to become the country's first black president.

Each hunkered down with top aides over the weekend to prepare, McCain at his vacation compound near Sedona, Ariz., Obama in the western mountains of newly competitive North Carolina.

In the 90-minute debate, NBC newsman Tom Brokaw will facilitate questions from the audience as tens of millions of viewers tune in from across the country.

"Generally, the stakes in this are higher for McCain," said Phil Musser, a former executive director of the Republican Governors Association. "It's probably one of the last and most important opportunities for him to lay out an economic vision that resonates with middle America in a format that lends itself to doing just that."

But Republicans and Democrats alike say even a strong McCain performance may not be enough.

"McCain can win the debate, but the trajectory of this election would not be fundamentally altered unless Obama also made a pretty dramatic and serious mistake," said Chris Lehane, a Democratic strategist in Vice President Al Gore's 2000 campaign.

McCain is most comfortable during the give-and-take of question-and-answer events that were a hallmark of his 2000 campaign, and his 2008 primary effort. But his consistency largely depends on his mood. When he's on his game, McCain is witty and charming, filled with ready one-liners and stories from his past. When he's off, McCain can come across cranky, surly and prone to gaffes.

Obama typically is much more at ease giving speeches from behind a lectern, though he has taken impromptu questions from audiences and has grown much more adept at the back-and-forth of voter-question sessions throughout the campaign. The debate provides the professorial Obama with an opportunity to show some and seal the deal with voters still struggling to see him as president.

Criticisms of each other are certain.

McCain "might as well take the gloves off," Palin said Monday, signaling that the GOP nominee may well question Obama's character, record and policies as part of a stepped-up effort to make Obama an unacceptable option for voters. It's also likely Obama will go after McCain anew on the Republican's 90 percent support for President Bush in the Senate, and possibly on his character as well.

Neither, however, can afford to swing so hard that he turns off voters, and the audience-participation format makes it a bit more difficult to fully engage.

Ahead of the debate, an Associated Press analysis based on polling, advertising and interviews with strategists on both sides indicated that Obama was on the cusp of the 270 votes needed to triumph in the state-by-state Electoral College vote count.

He has 21 states with 264 votes in his column or leaning his way, including Iowa and New Mexico. President Bush won both four years ago, but even Republicans concede they are likely to fall to the Democrats this year. Also tilting toward Obama: Minnesota, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, all states where Democrat John Kerry was victorious in 2004 and where McCain is competing hard.

That leaves McCain with 23 states with 185 votes in his column or leaning toward him, including three longtime Republican-held states that Obama is trying to swipe: Indiana, Missouri, and Montana.

Just six states , with 89 votes, still appear to be toss-ups — Colorado, Florida, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia — and all are states Bush secured four years ago, underscoring McCain's challenge.

McCain also is trying to win a single electoral vote in one of Maine's congressional districts, while Obama is doing the same in Nebraska.

Friday, Oct 10 at 9:50 AM J wrote ...

yea Obama is going to make everyone change religions and get abortions. Grow up. You have a mind use it for what you think is right. In the end God is the one who will judge. People break laws everyday and if a woman wants to have an abortion she is going to get it one way or another. It has been in the paper where teens have someone hit them in the stomach to kill the child. They made a safe haven laws to protect babies, but you are still going to have the ones who are going to abort the child.

Thursday, Oct 9 at 9:47 PM other joe wrote ...

oh, and by the way, i agree with the o'bama media payoff completely. anyone who don't see it is a big fool. i studied journalism in school, and this election coverage is the yellowist form of trash i have ever seen. catie couric is just trying to keep a job somewhere, anywhere. don't think that wasn't scripted by the liberal media maniacs. i watch the debates on fox news and they have a control group that splits the decision. go to cnn and o'sama has been elected already. sick made, dirty pool

Thursday, Oct 9 at 9:43 PM different joe wrote ...

ha ha ha, you liberals are a bunch of whacko's! my goodness, you don't even know why you are voting o'bama hussein socialist? does any of those words mean anything to you? get educated, get a job and get a life. i wish they gave an aptitude test before they let people jerk the little lever on election day, i know that at least then we could eliminate this massive, lying, hollywood idiot off the ticket and maybe God would spare whats left of this country. we started it based on God, not allah

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 8:17 PM J wrote ...

Say it isn't so Joe

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 2:46 PM Down with the neocons wrote ...

I think it needs to be said out loud. McCain-Palin are preaching hate. When they allow rallies to boo Obama and shout things like, "Obama is a terrorist," and "Kill Obama," without the candidate challenging the statements, they are allowing hate. If they want to make the false accusation that Obama has some kind of inappropriate relationships with Ayers, fine and dandy (to quote Palin). But the crowd shouting, the using Obama's middle name as if he were a Muslim, and the references to Obama

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 10:24 AM Anonymous wrote ...

Hey, look. Michelle Obama knew William Ayers too! http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=34203

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 9:29 AM Linda wrote ...

Obama is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Wake up people before it's too late! He'll bring change all right, but unless you're ready for socialism, you might want to think twice about that CHANGE you are anticipating.

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 8:48 AM Anonymous wrote ...

So, 8:31, you have no real reason? It's just for "change"?

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 8:45 AM Anonymous wrote ...

Joe, here's some reading material for you. http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/07/prosecutors-seek-delay-sentencing-tony-reko/

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 8:31 AM to the one who calls themselves Anonymous wrote ...

go back to AA ....wake up , it's a new day , get over it. There are many of us who are voting for Brack Obama because he's the best for the country, and we are proud of it because a CHANGE IS GONNA COME....

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 8:18 AM Anonymous wrote ...

"Check you wallet"? Joe must a another former SBCSC student. Does he even realize it's improper English?

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 8:15 AM Anonymous wrote ...

Joe, you still do nothing but name call. You're a typical democrat. You have no substance. Why are you voting for Obama? Is there a reason? Do you care that Obama might have been born in Kenya? Does it bother you that his neighbor, Tony Rezko has been convicted and is talking to the FBI? Would you vote for Obama even if he was indicted? I bet you would.

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 7:35 AM joe wrote ...

and and and.... Hey Anonymouse, you over the age of 18? whine whine whine. Obama is going to take states that you would never have thought were going to go democratic. why you ask? Check you bank, wallet, stocks, people killing themselves over the market and houses being taken away from them. I hear george on tv today say, "You can be sure of one thing though", yeah, I can george.

Tuesday, Oct 7 at 12:14 AM Anonymous wrote ...

Wouldn't it be funny if Obama was going to win in a landslide, but he was indicted before election day? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081007/ap_on_re_us/fundraiser_trial

Monday, Oct 6 at 9:52 PM Anonymous wrote ...

Meanwhile, WSBT is asleep at the wheel, regarding the Berg lawsuit against Obama. There really is one. Obama's trying to get it stopped and the mainstream media is ignoring it. Why is that, WSBT? How much is Obama paying you to ignore anything negative against him? http://www.americasright.com/2008/10/berg-v-obama-update-monday-october-6.html

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

WSBT and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, or remove user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum. Items that may be considered inappropriate to post are those containing profanity, hatred, or insensitive, vulgar, unlawful or threatening comments.

WSBT Weather

icon
Current Temp 19
°
More Weather
More On Demand

Stock Quotes

YouNews

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Tonight On WSBTFull Schedule

7.00
Jeopardy!
7.30
Wheel of Fortune
8.00
CSI: NY
9.00
CSI
10.00
Eleventh Hour
11.00
WSBT News
11.35
Late Show with David Letterman
12.35
Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson

Question of The Day

How often do you check your smoke detectors?

E-mail your comments. We'll pick some to read during WSBT News at 5.