Property Tax Relief Proposal Getting Mixed Reviews Locally

by Troy Kehoe (tkehoe@wsbt.com)

Tools

Property Tax Relief Proposal Getting Mixed Reviews Locally

By Jim Pinkerton

(WSBT) Debate over property tax relief kicks into high gear, after a group of Indiana lawmakers released a new plan Tuesday they say would cut some bills in half.

The bi-partisan Indiana Tax and Financing Policy Commission passed the plan unanimously after five months of debate. The commission's plan is similar to the one offered by Governor Mitch Daniels in October, with a few key differences.

Both would shift some local expenses like child welfare and school funding off of property taxes and onto the state. Both eliminate all elected township assessors, though the commission's plan would keep one elected assessor per county for public accountability. Both increase the state sales tax by 1 percent, from 6 percent to 7 percent, to pay for it.

The commission's plan allows for an expansion of the sales tax itself, that could keep the increase lower. It also expands another local tax, and that has some crying foul.

State Senator John Broden (D-South Bend) serves on the commission, and says the plan's goal is a 50 percent reduction in homeowners' bills. Governor Daniels plan calls for a 33 percent reduction, using the one cent per dollar increase in sales tax.

The commission's report says the drastic reduction can be accomplished by boosting the state's Homestead Tax Credit to $60,000, eliminating local government expenses, and capping the amount property owners can pay.

The governor's plan sets those caps at 1 percent for homeowners, 2 percent for rentals, and 3 percent for businesses.

But the commission's plan doesn't set specific percentages for the caps. Senator Broden says that's because the governor's figures aren't realistic.

"Looking at the numbers for St. Joseph County, I don't see how local government would be able to withstand a 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent circuit breaker."

And on that, county leaders agree.

But not on another aspect of the plan.

"We certainly hope there will be some replacement revenue provided by local municipal government," said Sen. Broden.

"That continues to give us heartburn," responded St. Joseph County Commissioner Mark Dobson (R-Granger). "A local option income tax is continues to be a part of the equation, and no other taxes."

The commission's plan depends on a boost in local income taxes to balance out the loss in property taxes. Right now, St. Joseph County is taxing at .08 percent of the 1 percent allowed under the local option income tax law passed by the legislature last year in response to concerns about the current circuit breaker caps.

The commission's report shows, as of November 1, only 10 of the state's 92 counties have adopted the full 1 percent income tax allowed under the new law.

"It's the legislature again saying we didn't raise your taxes. Those lousy people on county government raised your taxes," said St. Joseph County Commissioner Steve Ross (D-South Bend).

Local landlords are also concerned about the new plan, because it doesn't include language specifying the specific amount at which rental properties would be capped.

Instead, it sets a goal of a 25 percent reduction in their property tax bills.

"A 25 percent reduction would still leave non-owner occupied property with a tax increase for this year," said Real Estate Association of North Central Indiana President Edi Mathis. "They're making the disparity between homeowners and rental properties worse, rather than better. Our goal is eliminate the disparity. The 1,2,3 plan would bring us more relief and make it more bearable. It would allow more people to stay in this business."

Mathis says some landlords have gotten "out of the business" because of rising property tax rates. She says if the 2 percent cap on rental properties isn't passed many more could be forced out of business.

But Commissioner Ross says there is an even bigger concern for all taxpayers.

"[Neither plan] will give the citizens of St. Joe County or any other county in this state any relief for the next three years," he said.

Sen. Broden agrees neither plan is intended as a short term fix, but says other bills will be introduced to provide immediate property tax relief.

House Speaker B. Pat Bauer says he plans to introduce a "hybrid version" of the governor's plan at Wednesday's House organization day. That will allow lawmakers to debate the plan before the legislature reconvenes in January.

Sen. Broden says he hopes the report serves as a "road map" that will spark discussion on what changes should be made.

You can view the entire document and hear testimony that contributed to it by clicking on the link in the Related Content box.

Monday, Nov 19 at 6:52 AM Ed wrote ...

A higher sales tax will only drive business to to other states or the internet where there is no sales tax. Make it fair and raise income tax half of percent, that way the rich can actually pay their fair share. Or better yet SPEND RESPONSIBLY!!!

Thursday, Nov 15 at 10:21 AM G wrote ...

Cut the welfare for businesses, schools, sports fans, and construction industries, then cut the give away programs for loafers as well.

Wednesday, Nov 14 at 4:23 PM Anonymous wrote ...

People who don't pay property taxes and have children are not contributing as much towards schools as property owners. A higher sales tax to help the state pay for schools is a little more fair to everyone who has children in school.

Wednesday, Nov 14 at 3:13 PM M wrote ...

'Non-for Profit' needed to be amended. Too much land and the like are not being taxed in this county. I think that the tag of non-for profit is being misused.

Wednesday, Nov 14 at 12:03 PM NORMA wrote ...

IT IS ABOUT TIME THAT ST JOE COUNTY OFFICIALS QUIT WHINNING. THEY ARE TO BLAME FOR THE HIGH TAXES IN THIS AREA. AS LONG AS PEOPLE KEEP ELECTING THE SAME PEOPLE AND PARTY, YOU ARE STUCK WITH THE HIGH TAXES.

Wednesday, Nov 14 at 11:42 AM J wrote ...

Everything is already way too much, u can bet groceries - milk, bread, clothing, gas EVERYTHING will go up even more n they r already way too expensive! Owning a home is a luxury, u want to own one, YOU pay the taxes, dont raise costs for everyone!!

Wednesday, Nov 14 at 11:39 AM J wrote ...

If u want to do something, cut out freebies that go to the deadbeats who abuse the system. Good people living the right life cant get n e help, yet those not deserving of it get all kind of freebies! Raising the taxes is NOT the answer!

Wednesday, Nov 14 at 11:35 AM J wrote ...

This is wrong! Those who can afford to own their own home should be the ones to pay for their own home. Taxes are already high enough, why should everyone be punished with a higher yet sales tax! It is already high... EVERYTHING costs way too much!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

Comments are moderated and will not appear on this story until after they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

WSBT and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

Most Popular

WSBT Weather

icon
71
°
More Weather
More On Demand

Stock Quotes

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Tonight On WSBTFull Schedule

7.30
Jeopardy!
8.00
Numb3rs
9.00
CSI: NY
10.00
48 Hours Mystery
11.00
WSBT News
11.35
CSI: Miami
12.35
CSI: Miami

Question of The Day

Who is going to win the Super Bowl 2007 rematch?

  • Bears
  • Colts

Most Popular