Police catching teens with X-rated text messages

by Leanne Tokars (ltokars@wsbt.com)

Tools

X-rated text messages

Police say they are seeing more young girls sending nude or partially nude photos of themselves in cell phone text messages. If they are under 18 years old, that's illegal. (WSBT photo)

By WSBT News1

SOUTH BEND — Some teens are using their cell phones to send X-rated text messages, and police say many times they’re breaking the law.

Most teenagers say they send text messages.

“Yes, all the time. In class and every hour,” said one local teenager as she left school Wednesday afternoon.

But police say they’re seeing more and more texts with graphic content.

“It surprised me when it first came to the forefront, now it does not. I mean we see that a lot,” said Captain Phil Trent with the South Bend Police Department.

Many times police say they’re young girls, still in high school, sending nude or partially nude photos of themselves to their boyfriends.

“They really don't think anything of it,” said Commander Mitch Kajzer with the St. Joseph County High Tech Crimes Unit. “A lot of the kids have told me it's a fairly common practice."

But here’s the catch — when you send a photo using your cell phone, it doesn’t mean it will only stay between you and the person you send it to.

In fact, it only takes a couple seconds for the person who receives your text message to send it to someone else or post it on the Internet.

Once that happens, it could put you in trouble with the law. Many teenagers told WSBT that is something they didn’t know.

“If they're under 18 years old, it's illegal. Even though they're taking photos of themselves, it's still production of child pornography,” explained Kajzer. “When they send that photo out over the cellular network or onto the Internet — that's distribution of child pornography."

Kajzer says he gets about one to two new cases each week from parents finding images on their teen's cell phone or from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children gets their information from Internet service providers monitoring their networks for these images.

“You could argue that a lot of the text messaging — that type of activity — is protected under the First Amendment of free speech. Sending photos like that isn't,” said Kajzer.

That means you can get in trouble whether you're sending the text or receiving it.

Once the police identify the person in the photo, they contact them and their parents and conduct interviews to determine whether criminal charges will be filed.

Many cell phone networks allow parents to stop their children from being able to send or receive text messages through their cell phone plans.

Tuesday, Sep 2 at 5:25 PM faashooo wrote ...

Okay, I'm in the age range of 14-16! And all i have to say is that these girls want attention. That is really what they are striving for. I mean it really is stupid of them to want to take a picture like that. And parents, you really can't stop us, we do as we wish. Because we can find a way to do it.

Saturday, Apr 5 at 6:24 PM Perspective wrote ...

Here's a reminder: Teenagers had plenty of sex in the 90s, and the 80s, and the 70s, and the 60s, and the 50s, and even before that. There's no "moral decline" here. This is the same as it ever was, but with new technology. Humans become sexually active and aware sometime around 14-16 years of age. Some blossom sooner, some blossom later, but ALL become interested in sex during adolescence. you can't prevent it. Be honest with your kids; talk about sex. They will make good choice if you do.

Thursday, Apr 3 at 12:27 AM KrispeKreme wrote ...

Oh, and on the matter of controlling us chillun'... Got news for you, most of us have our own source of income. I buy a mobile online, and have the whole order processed, sent to my own email account, the password of which my parents have no clue of. In fact if I really wanted to order something tricky I could just create a stand-alone email account and do business on that. It's truly so sad how articles sometimes assume that parents are remotely capable of keeping tabs on their kids.

Thursday, Apr 3 at 12:22 AM KrispeKreme wrote ...

Seeing as I am smack in the middle of the general age they are referring to, I would like to say that from my or our(if I can speak for others of my group) perspective, the notion of modesty and privacy is dying, withering away. Get used to it, it's only going to speed up. Myself, I absolutely know that once I post a pic online, it's pretty much permanent, and I wouldn't mind it one bit, ney I'd like to have people adore my body, and if it lets some pedo release some tension then it's all good.

Wednesday, Mar 5 at 2:10 AM Yeah wrote ...

The countries sexual repression seems to bring this onto minors. Parents are responsible, all you Swingers, Perverts, mentally disturbed "friendly parents."

Sunday, Mar 2 at 4:34 PM JoJo wrote ...

To Kristin - the article above was refering to "minors" making foolish decisions without thought of possible negative consequences. This is something that "minors" tend to do during their lives as "minors". You, however, are not a "minor" and are free to make any foolish decision you want to. This world is full of predators and, as I stated before, adults have the responsiblity to protect "minors". Good Luck

Saturday, Mar 1 at 11:11 PM mother in elkhart wrote ...

i'm shock 2 days ago i found a picture of a girl naked in my son's cel phone i took the phone chip away. i had no idea that this was happening around. poor girl that is in the picture thinking that her boyfriend was going to be the only one seeing the picture.

Saturday, Mar 1 at 10:33 PM mom of girls in granger wrote ...

whats wrong with some of you parents? omg I have 2 girls and I would take cell phones away and have a serious chat with them if I thought they were sending pics of themselves! teach your girls to respect themselves or no one else will. kids need to keep cell phones off in school they should be only for emergencies. yes you can check online. some plans only let them use them during certain time like NOT WHILE IN SCHOOL. except in emergencies wow some of these posts I can not believe!!!

Saturday, Mar 1 at 12:43 PM ICE wrote ...

Ryan Do you really believe your child is not having sex if they are sending nude pictures. Wake up Dorothy you're not in Kansas anymore!!!

Saturday, Mar 1 at 12:01 PM Dex wrote ...

"I look at it like this: I'd rather have my daughter sending nude photo(s) than actually having sex." --- Wow. Someone has to use that in a movie. Comedy gold. Wow.

Saturday, Mar 1 at 9:53 AM Kristin wrote ...

to JOJO..thats fine that they are minors...IM NOT..so just becuase little kids like to go around doing this becuase they have no morals..why should i have to worry about who can see my txt messages...just like in school just because a few kids act up why should we all be punished!

Saturday, Mar 1 at 4:04 AM Sad wrote ...

We need parents! Until a child is 21 or 18 and living on their own a parent is someone who checks up on and monitors their childrens behavior. Yes, we miss some things,but a parent should be checking a teens cellphone activities these days for the child's protection if nothing else.You are not your child's friend, they have plenty of friends, they need a parent.A child that is texting a nude photo of themselves has very little self respect and needs some guidance. Yes, I'm from the old school

Saturday, Mar 1 at 12:47 AM Beth wrote ...

I'm 19 yrs old and here is my bit about this article. It's really the parents fault for this happening. If they would teach self respect and morals starting at a very young age, it's much less likely that child will do any of this disgusting activity. But too many parents now want to be a friend not a mentor, that they don't care. If you want the police to leave your child alone, start teaching them how to behave properly.

Friday, Feb 29 at 9:43 PM GOSHEN wrote ...

Only in AMERICA!!!!!

Friday, Feb 29 at 9:40 PM Anonymous wrote ...

Why all the conversation? Things are going to continue to deteriorate not because people don't care, but because people don't want to discipline themselves and go without or take the rougher road. Would somebody please name one thing for me invented in the last 100 years that was meant to improve life that hasn't turned out to be a major cause of the problem? Anyone? Anything? Our grandchildren are doomed, we're dispicable. How's that for truth?And I don't give a rats backside about my spelling!

Friday, Feb 29 at 5:48 PM JoJo wrote ...

Are your people even listening to what is being said?!! MINORS are taking pics and sending them! I can't believe you are hung up on "rights" when it's a safety issue. Adults (that would be parents, teachers, law enforcement, etc.)are supposed to protect minors - even from themselves! Look beyond your "righteous indignation" and see it for what it is! Moral issues aside, think of potential employers seeking info on the web. With a pic and a name - kiss any decent jobs goodbye.

Friday, Feb 29 at 5:31 PM Dirk Diggler wrote ...

First off, it's MTV and other shoes that make young teens think it's ok to act this way. If girls would've worn to school what they were now back in '97, they would've been sent home. I don't think it's wrong if boyfriend and girlfriend send naughty texts to each other though, kids are having sex in junior high nowadays, what's the difference? The media has desensitized kids to sexuality and nudity. There needs to be more policing there!!

Friday, Feb 29 at 5:00 PM John wrote ...

If text messaging was not allowed and cell phones were banned to people under 18, we would not have all of these issues, (paying attention in school, pornography(obviously, these children have no integrity about themselves), and no worrying about perverts, police/law interference). Just think how it would simplify everything!!!

Friday, Feb 29 at 4:17 PM Anonymous wrote ...

It's a fact! Some people become hysterical to the point of laughing out of control in situations where they are frightened or frustrated. Society is both and all kinds of people react all kinds of ways. Some make jokes that seem inappropriate under the circumstances. Some simply withdraw from a world where they feel they have no control. Some bully others to prove that they still have control and some, like it or not, go on killing rampages. It's a strange strange world we live in, master Jack!

Friday, Feb 29 at 3:41 PM Ralph wrote ...

A nude picture of someone is NOT pornography !

Friday, Feb 29 at 3:25 PM Anonymous wrote ...

I do not understand why people are allowed to comment on these articles to begin with. This is what you get from that.

Friday, Feb 29 at 1:58 PM Kristin wrote ...

What happened to privacy?? and how are these cops seeing these text messages...UNBELIEVABLE! they think they are helping but really just being nosey i dont need "cops" going through my text messages no one goes through theirs im sure!

Friday, Feb 29 at 12:00 PM Lynn wrote ...

Jenny you bring up a great point here. Children could be doing great damage to themselves viewing themselves nude in a mirror. Not only are they breaking the law by producing it by standing in front of the mirror but by viewing it likewise. I would not remove the entire mirror just replace it with a smaller one so my child only sees her face in the mirror and not her (whole self) heaven forbid if she should view her entire body without clothes on in a mirror.

Friday, Feb 29 at 11:52 AM JASON wrote ...

I UNDERSTAND THAT SENDING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY VIA TEXT MESSAGE IS ILLEGAL. BUT HOW CAN RECEIVING IT BE? A PERSON CAN NOT CONTROL WHO AND WHAT IS TEXTED TO THEM. ITS LIKE RECEIVING JUNK EMAIL, YOU MAY NOT WANT IT BUT IT STILL GETS DELIVERED.

Friday, Feb 29 at 11:29 AM ron wrote ...

Why would they send nude photos to their boyfriend anyway,doesn`t he know what she looks like? OH,so he puts them on internet so all the pervs get to look!!!Smart move morons...

Friday, Feb 29 at 11:08 AM jenny wrote ...

Take the mirrors out of your kids rooms. If kids look at themselves in the buff in a mirror they are breaking the law because the mirror create an image of them in the buff thus they are guilty of PRODUCING child porn. Mirrors should only be allowed in a child's room if they are over 18.

Friday, Feb 29 at 10:56 AM Robert wrote ...

Somehow I don't feel any safer

Friday, Feb 29 at 10:51 AM Ted wrote ...

I didn't get a good "picture" of what's happening. I think the story needed more images to explain the problem.

Friday, Feb 29 at 10:43 AM I gess I was lucky wrote ...

SO a minor who photographs themself is guilty of producing child pornography. Wow! I'm sure glad no one busted into my bedroom when I was fifteen years old 30years ago; I'd still be in prison! And I didn't even have a camera.

Friday, Feb 29 at 10:32 AM Brandon wrote ...

Police have no business in this. Parents should be the ones policing their kids activities. It is not ok for the government who needs to be worried about criminals to waste resources checking for high school kids getting naked. Most people must not loose their verginit these days till college!!! Get a life and let the parents deal with it. I couldnt agree with Joe B more.

Friday, Feb 29 at 8:39 AM MM wrote ...

this issue is a family issue not a govt issue.

Friday, Feb 29 at 8:12 AM mitch wrote ...

I would venture it is a safe bet that Joe B and Ryan are either young or frequent fliers of porn sites. This is not OK! Behavior like this is not innocent and if you are willing to send a nude photo then you are way more likely willing to do more. Its not just a picture. You two guys are sick! Who would talk about their daughter in such a way? Maybe you need investigated if you indeed do have children.

Friday, Feb 29 at 7:57 AM SS wrote ...

If your teen daughter is sending out nude pictures of herself, I think it's a pretty safe bet that she IS having sex (more than once). Parents- why do your kids have text capabilities? in class? Don't you think the teachers have it rough enough without the need to police under the desk texting? I believe you can check a cell phones activity online. Parents please at least make sure your child knows you will be watching.

Friday, Feb 29 at 6:29 AM joe b wrote ...

In America everything you do is a crime. Everything invented some law maker finds a way to make it illegal.Ever wonder why we have more people in jail then any other country on earth? FREEDOM OR CONTROLLING GOVERMENT? Try to find something that does not break the law. GOOD LUCK!!!

Friday, Feb 29 at 12:18 AM Wayne wrote ...

Judging from parents views on the net I would say most parents are okay with this behavior. Let the kids doing anything they want so they don't rebel. It's just sad!

Thursday, Feb 28 at 11:37 PM Ryan wrote ...

I look at it like this: I'd rather have my daughter sending nude photo(s) than actually having sex.

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

Comments are moderated and will not appear on this story until after they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

WSBT and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

Most Popular

WSBT Weather

icon
57
°
More Weather
More On Demand

Stock Quotes

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Tonight On WSBTFull Schedule

7.00
Wheel of Fortune
7.30
Jeopardy!
8.00
Big Bang Theory
8.30
How I Met Your Mother
9.00
Two and a Half Men
9.30
The New Adventures of Old Christine
10.00
CSI: Miami
11.00
WSBT News
11.35
Late Show with David Letterman

Question of The Day

Who is going to win the Super Bowl 2007 rematch?

  • Bears
  • Colts

Most Popular