Accident leads to questions on Breathalyzer policies

By DAVE STEPHENS, Tribune Staff Writer

Tools

By Tiffany Griffin

MISHAWAKA — A late-night traffic accident has left a Niles man alleging that Mishawaka police are lax in their enforcement of drunken-driving laws.

The Mishawaka Police Department is responding by asking that doubters check its operating while intoxicated arrest record.

The incident in question started at 12:30 a.m. Feb. 25, when a driver crashed into the parked car of Jason Ward in front of Lan Lizards, 121 Lincoln Way West.

Ward, who works at Lan Lizards, said the man who crashed into his vehicle admitted to having been out drinking alcohol and was worried about being arrested.

Police were also aware that the man had been drinking — even citing the information in the accident report.

But Ward is upset no Breathalyzer test was administered to the man, and he doesn’t understand the police’s reluctance to perform the test.

“The guy hit a parked car with no other cars around,” Ward said. “That doesn’t just happen.”

However, Mishawaka Police Capt. Tim Spencer said that an accident — even when the driver admits he has been drinking — doesn’t automatically require the driver be tested.

“Case law requires us to have probable cause before we can do the breath test,” Spencer said.

Probable cause, Spencer said, would include slurred speech or poor coordination — attributes the driver didn’t possess.

Spencer said it’s common for the department’s officers to stop vehicles in which the driver admits to having had a drink or two, and a Breathalyzer test is not given.

“An admission to drinking is not the same as being intoxicated,” Spencer said. “The allegation that the Mishawaka Police Department is not doing our job — we could stack our OWI arrest record up against anyone’s in the state.”

In 2007, the Mishawaka Police Department made 217 drunken-driving arrests. That same year the St. Joseph County DUI task force, which includes the Mishawaka, South Bend, St. Joseph County, Notre Dame and Walkerton police, made a total of 494 arrests.

Spokesmen for the South Bend Police Department and the Indiana State Police both said their agencies have the same policy for administering Breathalyzer tests.

“There are circumstances where you might have a more clearly defined policy, such as personal injury versus property damage,” said Capt. Phil Trent, South Bend Police public information officer. “But if you go to the scene of a crash and somebody is not impaired, it is at the officer’s discretion.”

Ward, however, is still upset by the incident and has continued to press the police department for a response — his father has already filed complaints with the police department and the mayor.

With his car totaled and with the other driver being uninsured, Ward is unsure how to proceed.

“I wouldn’t even care that much if they had given him a Breathalyzer and he had passed,” Ward said. “But they never did, so we don’t know.”

Friday, Mar 14 at 10:22 PM hunter wrote ...

Driver was never sited for no insurance. The car was not his either. 2 people fled that car on foot before the police arrived. no investigation. mayors office was emailed about the accident and did not reply. the whole thing is a cover up. cops covering up for other cops. In the military, a mistake like this one would have caused someone thier life. Mishawaka cops said no mistake was made. All local Tv news stations were notified on this incident. They would not cover the story.Are they scared?

Friday, Mar 14 at 9:22 PM KEN wrote ...

THE STORY DOES NOT MENTION THAT 2 OTHER PEOPLE, WERE IN THIS DRUNK DRIVERS CAR AND GOT AWAY BEFORE THE COPS ARRIVED. WHAT DID THEY TAKE WITH THEM, POSSIBLE DRUGS,GUNS OR THE ALCOHOL THAT WAS BEING CONSUMED THAT NIGHT. NO INVESTIGATION INTO TO THIS WHOLE DEAL. MISHAWAKA COPS DROPPED THE WHOLE BALL. EVEN LOCAL TV STATIONS WOULD NOT COVER THIS ACCIDENT. THEY LET THE GUY GET BACK IN HIS CAR AND DRIVE AWAY. MAYBE IT WILL BE THIER FAMILY MEMBER THAT GETS HIT OR KILLED THE NEXT TIME THIS GUY IS DRUNK.

Wednesday, Mar 12 at 9:28 AM Elk PD off wrote ...

Ignorance, ignorance. driving with no insurance is an infraction, not arrestable. Did Ward ever mention if the driver was put there field sobriety tests. also a portable breath test on the scene???if the driver passes the tests and the portable breath test, then why take him to jail and give him a breathalyzer. it is almost pointless for PDs to have to explain there state mandated procedures to civilians, when they do not understand laws and procedures. Let them do their jobs,stop complaing

Wednesday, Mar 12 at 8:52 AM joan wrote ...

maybe the cop was late meeting his buddies for donuts and did'nt want to take the time for the breathe test

Tuesday, Mar 11 at 10:30 AM Constitution wrote ...

I am not bias to cops. But We the People have rights. You guys are all saying that if I, or you, get in a wreck the police should test for drunk driveing. The constitution protescts us. Probable cause is there for us. Saying the cops are "Key Stone" shows ignorence. I thank them for excercising constitutional rights. Otherwise maybe they should stop everone, beat them up, take there money, then arrest them. I say thanks. Sure criminals need to be locked up, but everybody has rights.

Tuesday, Mar 11 at 9:19 AM sober wrote ...

Ever have a breathalyzer? I got stopped for doing 42 in a 40 I'd had a glass of wine at dinner. But before the breathalyzer he put me through "stupid human tricks," a series of stunts while the cops (now four of them on the scene) did their best to intimidate me and make me nervous. finally - after all this "field sobriety testing" - they had me blow in the machine. Guess what? Not drunk. But four cops had to stand around for 20 minutes before letting me go.

Monday, Mar 10 at 7:40 PM Anon wrote ...

Once again the anti police know it alls are chiming in. How many of you arm chair quarter backs have ever made an arrest? No insruance is an infraction not an arrestable offense. The DUI, if he had failed, would have done nothing to further insurance claim. Who'd he pay first, you or his lawyer?

Monday, Mar 10 at 6:28 PM Lisa wrote ...

So who does this guy know on the lovely Mishawaka Police Force?????

Monday, Mar 10 at 5:17 PM Cliff wrote ...

I don't like the idea that it was left up to the cops discretion. They are to biased, and often influenced by how their day or night is going. The driver should have been arrested for driving without insurance, and yes, hitting a parked car his propable cause, they should have tested the driver!

Monday, Mar 10 at 3:55 PM LanLizards-Zook wrote ...

This is of concern to me since only 2 years ago a drunk driver plowed into our old location on Main St., a great hardship on my business. Again a driver, on a perfectly clear night and clear straight road, swerves towards my building, and admits to drinking. I would like to think the police are doing what they can to deter drunk driving, but when the driver admits to drinking, and then is not tested; I grow concerned. At least the driver did not run from the scene, which shows some character.

Monday, Mar 10 at 3:08 PM Bev wrote ...

A drunk hit our car and another. Cops came took him down the street and let him out.Cops said they would have had to have seen him driving before they could do anything. His car was towed. We never could find out who he was. Our insurance's had to pay. Mishawaka Keystone cops. We had a car stolen. Cops were called and given all the particulars. Later we got call past midnight by State police, they were chasing some girls in our car. They had no report from the mish. police.

Monday, Mar 10 at 12:13 PM Rich wrote ...

He must have been a cop, or is that the one they use the uncertified machine.

Monday, Mar 10 at 11:16 AM bob wrote ...

Cops have all the answers.. just ask them

Monday, Mar 10 at 10:57 AM Confused wrote ...

I don't understand how Ward thinks the breathalyzer changes his circumstances with the uninsured driver. Would his insurance pay because the other driver got a ticket or went to jail????

Monday, Mar 10 at 10:45 AM Donna wrote ...

This is outrageous!!!! Like Amy stated- isn't it illegal to not have car insurance? What more does the Mishawaka Police department need to administer a Breathalyzer? The person admitted to drinking, and hit a parked car--- wouldn't that be sufficent probable cause?? Of course, the Police Department stands behind the officer's choice not to administer the test. Makes you wonder who the person that hit the parked car is related to in Mishawaka- doesn't it?

Monday, Mar 10 at 9:04 AM Amy wrote ...

Isn't it also illegal to drive without insurance? Was the driver sited for that?

Monday, Mar 10 at 9:00 AM Amy wrote ...

If someone hitting a parked car doesn't show a lack of coordination what does? We wonder why people continually get killed by drunk drivers...

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

WSBT and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, or remove user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum. Items that may be considered inappropriate to post are those containing profanity, hatred, or insensitive, vulgar, unlawful or threatening comments.

WSBT Weather

icon
Current Temp 13
°
More Weather
More On Demand

Stock Quotes

YouNews

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Tonight On WSBTFull Schedule

7.00
Jeopardy!
7.30
Wheel of Fortune
8.00
CSI: NY
9.00
CSI
10.00
Eleventh Hour
11.00
WSBT News
11.35
Late Show with David Letterman
12.35
Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson

Question of The Day

How often do you check your smoke detectors?

E-mail your comments. We'll pick some to read during WSBT News at 5.