Historic bailout bill passes Congress; Bush signs

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVID and DAVID ESPO, Associated Press Writers

Tools

President Bush signs bailout bill

President Bush signs the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington after the House passed the $700 billion financial bailout bill, Friday, Oct. 3, 2008. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON (AP) — With the economy on the brink of meltdown and elections looming, a reluctant Congress abruptly reversed course and approved a historic $700 billion government bailout of the battered financial industry on Friday. President Bush swiftly signed it.

The 263-171 House vote capped two weeks of tumult in Congress and on Wall Street, punctuated by urgent warnings from Bush that the country confronted the gravest economic disaster since the Great Depression if lawmakers failed to act.

"We have acted boldly to help prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country," Bush said shortly after the plan cleared Congress, although he conceded, "our economy continues to face serious challenges."

His somber warning was underscored on Wall Street, where enthusiasm over the rescue gave way to worries about obstacles still facing the economy, and the Dow Jones industrials dropped 157 points. The Labor Department said earlier in the day that employers had slashed 159,000 jobs in September, the largest cut in five years.

The vote was a striking turnaround from the measure's spectacular failure earlier in the week, which had triggered a massive stock sell-off and prompted jittery lawmakers — fearing a crushing economic contagion that was spreading to their constituents — to reconsider.

"Let's not kid ourselves: We're in the midst of a recession. It's going to be a rough ride, but it will be a whole lot rougher ride" without the rescue plan, said Rep. John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, the minority leader, as he prepared to cast his vote for the most sweeping federal intervention in markets in decades.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson pledged quick action to get the program up and operating.

The bailout, which gives the government broad authority to buy up toxic mortgage-related investments and other distressed assets from tottering financial institutions, is designed to ease a credit crunch that began on Wall Street but is engulfing businesses around the nation.

"In these past two weeks, we've seen things we never thought we would see before in terms of the economic insecurity of our own country," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. She said the measure would "begin to shape the financial stability of our country and the economic security of our people."

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman, said the rescue bill was just the beginning of a much larger task Congress will tackle next year: overhauling housing policy and financial regulation in a legislative effort he compared to the New Deal.

"We were the EMTs rushing to the rescue of an economy that suddenly found itself choking, but now we have to perform more serious reform," Frank said.

Just four days earlier, the previous version of the bill was sent down to defeat, largely at the hands of angry conservative Republicans. On Friday, a total of 33 Democrats and 25 Republicans switched from opposition to support. In all, 91 Republicans joined 172 Democrats to support the measure while 108 Republicans and 63 Democrats voted "no."

The reversal reflected a high-stakes political environment just four weeks before Election Day. Some lawmakers were worried about their own jobs, but others — mostly Democrats — focused on the prospect that a new president could have a far more significant effect on the economy than any one piece of legislation.

Several of the Democratic switchers were members of the Congressional Black Caucus who said they changed course after securing commitments from presidential candidate Barack Obama that he would back legislation to help struggling consumers and homeowners facing foreclosures if he wins the White House.

"It's not too often you get the future president telling you that his priority matches your priority," said Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., one of 13 black lawmakers who switched from "no" to "yes."

Republican presidential candidate John McCain also lobbied for the measure, according to aides who declined to say whom he called.

Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the party vote-counter, said McCain phoned Rep. John Shadegg, a fellow Arizonan who switched to "yes."

The legislation's roller-coaster ride through Congress began at a somber meeting in Pelosi's office in mid-September where Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke frightened senior Democrats and Republicans with their warnings of an impending economic collapse without quick legislative action.

As lawmakers scrambled to draft a bill, they were barraged by angry calls from constituents to reject what many saw as a huge giveaway to the very financial institutions that helped cause the subprime mortgage meltdown at the root of the economic crisis — with nothing to help its ordinary victims.

"Pray for our republic," intoned Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, a leading opponent of the measure. "She's being placed in very uncaring and greedy hands."

Supporters said the prospect of economic disaster superseded their political fears.

"I may lose this race over this vote, but that's OK with me," said Republican Rep. Sue Myrick of North Carolina, who switched her vote to favor the measure. "This is the right vote for the country."

After the breathtaking House defeat on Monday, Senate leaders took custody of the rescue, adding on $110 billion in tax breaks designed to attract additional support. They attached the overall measure to a popular bill mandating broader mental health coverage in the insurance industry.

The rescue measure was changed to lift, from $100,000 to $250,000, the cap on government bank deposit insurance — a key priority for Republicans. Also key to winning GOP support was a decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission to ease accounting rules that require financial institutions to show the deflated value of assets on their balance sheets.

The revised measure won Senate approval Wednesday night, 74-25, setting up a furious round of lobbying in the House as the administration, congressional leaders, the presidential candidates and outside groups joined forces behind the measure.

The maneuvers worked — augmented by a shift in public opinion that occurred after the stock market took its largest-ever one-day dive on Monday.

The plan — initially a three-page request from the Bush administration for unlimited power to use $700 billion any way it saw fit to stabilize markets — swelled to more than 450 pages as negotiators added restrictions for the administration and sweeteners for anxious members of Congress.

Lawmakers added greater supervision over the $700 billion — including a process in which Congress could vote to block half the money — measures to protect taxpayers and crack down on golden parachutes for corporate executives whose companies benefit from the bailout.

Wednesday, Oct 8 at 9:29 AM DEBBIE wrote ...

WELL FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC GAVE ALL THAT MONEY TO OBAMA`S CAMPAIGN AND HAD TO BE BAILED OUT, WHY DID THEY HOLD THAT INFRO TILL AFTER THE BAIL OUT? THEY ARE CROOKS,AND WHY IS THE MEDIA KEEPING HUSH HUSH ON THE LAW SUITS FILED AGAINST OBAMA?http://www.americasright.com/2008/08/obama-sued-in-philadelphia-federal.html ARE THEY USING OUR TAX DOLLARS TO HUSH THE MEDIA? WHY ARE WE NOT BEING INFORMED ON THIS. WE STRUGGLE DAILEY, THEY DON`T. SO THEY ARE NOT FOR US,ONLY FOR OUR MONEY.WE MADE THE RICH

Sunday, Oct 5 at 7:42 AM wow wrote ...

oh yeah, i agree, as we all should, GET RID OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. this should be tax-paying voters #1 PRIORITY.

Sunday, Oct 5 at 7:37 AM wow wrote ...

PHOTO FOUND IN A YEAR 2510 TEXTBOOK: heres a picture of a man destoying the struggling , working class american family. notice how he forms the letter X with his instrument. the smirkish look on his face signifies he has taken care of his own kind at the cost of "SHEEPISH TOLERANTS" to their new world order.

Saturday, Oct 4 at 3:27 PM sensible wrote ...

Trebor the third party will never be succesful with the electoral college. You need 51% of the vote to win a state. It is however possible that the democrat or republican parties would be replaced, by the third party. Sounds good but it's a 0% chance of happening.

Saturday, Oct 4 at 1:10 PM Trebor wrote ...

Enough of this B.S. America needs a strong third party for the middle class!! If you get caught working against the good of America, we hang you from the visitors goal post in N.D. stadium (during half time).

Saturday, Oct 4 at 9:11 AM Cornfusion TWO! wrote ...

We are going to bed tonight witht he same problems we went to bed with last week. These guys REALLY SHOULD BE weathermen! They told us they could make things "Partly Cloudy". The House was smart enough NOT to bite on that, so they changed it to,"We can make it PARTLY SUNNY!" Oh well, sun is good! Put me down! IT's STILL CLOUDY and one of these days it's going to pour and flood. We can't change it, it's what we've set ourselves up for. Now we can only dress for the weather and weather the storm!

Saturday, Oct 4 at 9:05 AM Cornfusion One wrote ...

If this bill had not been signed into law I think we could all still be singing, "The Sun Will Come Up Tomorrow, Bet Your Bottom Dollar That Tomorrow There'll Be Sun!" But the bill was signed and today, metaphorically speaking (Because the sun really is out)it's cloudy and it will remain cloudy in the foreseeable future because YOU CAN'T CHANGE THE WEATHER! The ink is not even dry on the bill and congressional leaders are already saying that this is a bandage, NOT A CURE!

Saturday, Oct 4 at 8:34 AM jake w wrote ...

vote them all out because they don;t listen

Saturday, Oct 4 at 12:02 AM COrnfusion wrote ...

So if I remember correctly, every man, woman and child will be provided with two Whoppers a day for a year.Right?

Friday, Oct 3 at 9:04 PM ME wrote ...

I guess you all forget WHO was on the TV all week telling us that we need the bail out to pass--I believe that was republican leader George W. Bush Jr. HiMsElF! Wasn't it? Oh my--YES it was!

Friday, Oct 3 at 8:52 PM steve wrote ...

when are the storm troopers going to march down the street

Friday, Oct 3 at 7:33 PM Anonymous wrote ...

todd, you can get bailed out only if you're a crooked bank or illegal alien... take your pick

Friday, Oct 3 at 7:31 PM That's it JOE! wrote ...

I am a democrat and I am voting for Luke Puckett. I have had it with that Donnelly guy. He could care less about how we all got the shaft on this pork barrel bill.

Friday, Oct 3 at 7:29 PM to mike at 4:44 p.m. wrote ...

are you really that ignorant??? the government gets the money from YOU AND I! that is if you pay taxes and are not on welfare.

Friday, Oct 3 at 7:24 PM hey carol at 3:07 p.m. wrote ...

The free market DOES work, the problem is the COMMIE SOCIALISTS that run our government!

Friday, Oct 3 at 7:18 PM Anonymous wrote ...

How fitting to be signing the biggest piece of socliast BS (expect more under Obama) with the flag sitting in the background.

Friday, Oct 3 at 6:36 PM Trebor wrote ...

Looks like us Republicans may have lost the race this week. I wrote my rep and told him not to vote, he didn't listen.

Friday, Oct 3 at 6:35 PM boomer954 wrote ...

i agree vote all these crooks out of office but we won't because we're all talk and these crooks know it we need to prove them wrong and don't just talk about voting them out of office and really do it

Friday, Oct 3 at 6:35 PM Laurie wrote ...

While I don't like the idea of the bailout, I think it was the only way to stabilize the market. People never talk about who is affected by stocks declining. It's the seniors who don't have a way to recoup their pension funds, and the workers futures through the heavy investment in the stock market by pension funds. It's not all for the rich CEOs. It trickles down down to your parents and your future.

Friday, Oct 3 at 5:44 PM Todd wrote ...

So if i go out and blow all of my money can I get rescued and get free money from the gvt.

Friday, Oct 3 at 5:18 PM Alcione Marshfield wrote ...

Now our rent is gona go down? Would be some help for heating bill when the harsh winter arrives? Our credit cards will stop coming? I got Master card, Discover, and American Express. All of them I used for paying food bills and the electric. The rent I pay cash because the landlord does not trust even personal checks. They have no funds available he told me the other day when I was trying to give him my rent. People distrust everyone now. They think we are freebies and take advantage of him.

Friday, Oct 3 at 4:22 PM Junkyard Dog wrote ...

Too bad nothing will change, either for the economy or the idiots that voted for this. The economy will still be a mess and those idiots will still be in office.

Friday, Oct 3 at 4:14 PM intheknow wrote ...

Hey Mike, don't you know they create money out of thin air by cranking up the printing presses? Of course if we do that we go to jail. Our gov. is the bigest bunch of crooks on the planet.

Friday, Oct 3 at 3:44 PM mike wrote ...

I wonder from who or what they are getting the money from to pay for this

Friday, Oct 3 at 3:35 PM Anon wrote ...

I have an idea.....why not pay our taxes and see what our bail-out will be....JAIL that is what it will be.

Friday, Oct 3 at 2:57 PM Anonymous wrote ...

Yeah for socialism! Viva la resitance! Vote McCain-Palin in '08!

Friday, Oct 3 at 2:39 PM sheeple wrote ...

Wake up. Your gov. officials will be the first to tell you they are not your representatives, they are your leaders. They believe you do not know whats best, they do. If they represented us by the original ratios put in place by our founding father, the house of "reps" would have about 3000 members.

Friday, Oct 3 at 2:29 PM Jason wrote ...

I like the flag photo. It sums the story up nicely. This country is run by corporations, not the people. What's good for corporate America is all that matters to our government these days. The American people are just an inconveniance at this point, something to be managed and kept in line while the folks at the top keep getting richer at our expense.

Friday, Oct 3 at 2:07 PM Carol wrote ...

This is pure and simple socialism. The free market doesn't work!

Friday, Oct 3 at 2:04 PM Taxpayer wrote ...

This is just disgusting! What a bunch of Pansies! So the "Prez" can sleep again at nights. What a disgrace that us taxpayers have to bail out the rich. Makes me not want to vote as they don't listen to the people anyway. Truly Disgusting!

Friday, Oct 3 at 1:51 PM Response to confused wrote ...

Here is the basics of what will occur. The government will purchase the bad assets held by banks (i.e. foreclosed homes and other loans gone bad). The banks will then have that "cash" available to loan out more money to people. Normally, the banks would use deposits to provide the money for loans. That is why there is normally a difference between "savings" interest rates and "borrowing" interest rates. That is their buffer/profit.

Friday, Oct 3 at 1:43 PM Reply to educator wrote ...

According to the representatives themselves, there was an overwhelming dislike for the bill. If it is truly the case of them representing correctly, let them publish the number of e-mails and phone calls for and against the bill.

Friday, Oct 3 at 1:43 PM Anonymous wrote ...

I think we need to simply stop paying our taxes until the government starts taking care of AMERICA.. especially when they say.. pledged "serious surgery" next year to address the underlying causes of the crisis. MEANING those who caused this mess still get there golden parachutes until next year so quick get your oney and disappear...they they add all the other tax breaks to swing the vote.. what a TOTAL crock to the American Middle Class !!

Friday, Oct 3 at 1:37 PM Anonymous wrote ...

the markets luv it so much it dropped 200 points. what a bunch of morons!!!!

Friday, Oct 3 at 1:28 PM Confused wrote ...

I am confused at what all this money is going towards. Do we as the public get a dime of that in an incentive, or is this all going to banks and Wall Street to bail them out. Can anyone help clarify what this all means to the public in particular?

Friday, Oct 3 at 1:06 PM frustrated citizen wrote ...

I agree with Vote them out. This is a debt that the taxpayers should not have had to take on.

Friday, Oct 3 at 1:05 PM Sandy wrote ...

I am really shocked that this thing got voted on. Here we go again they are more worried about the corporate bigwigs instead of the American taxpayers. I would have liked to pay the taxpayers the 700 billion instead of the dumb speculators who instigated this mess. They are the ones who caused the Oil crisis as well as wall street issue. As usual John Q citizen well be an after thought.

Friday, Oct 3 at 1:03 PM Educator wrote ...

They represented me. My emails and calls were heard. Don't assume you have the only opinion on this.

Friday, Oct 3 at 12:56 PM Myrt wrote ...

I agree, lets vote them all out and start fresh - it can't be any worse than what we already have "representing" us. Maybe the new blood will actually listen to their constituents.

Friday, Oct 3 at 12:45 PM Nicole wrote ...

Okay, the dems and left wing nuts got their $ for wool research. I'm going to just sit back and watch how much better my life is going to be now. Hmm, 99cent gas, $2 gallons of milk, come back to me good ol days.

Friday, Oct 3 at 12:43 PM Vote them out wrote ...

This is the worst travesty that I have ever heard of. "Representatives" voting the opposite of what the people that they represent want. They think that they are wiser than thousands of constituents that e-mailed and called them. Vote them all out of office and take back the power of the voter!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

Comments are moderated and will not appear on this story until after they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

WSBT and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

WSBT Weather

icon
Current Temp 27
°
More Weather
More On Demand

Stock Quotes

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Tonight On WSBTFull Schedule

7.00
Wheel of Fortune
7.30
Jeopardy!
8.00
Big Bang Theory
8.30
How I Met Your Mother
9.00
Two and a Half Men
9.30
Worst Week
10.00
CSI: Miami
11.00
WSBT News
11.35
Late Show with David Letterman

Question of The Day

Do you think Notre Dame should keep Charlie Weis?

E-mail your comments. We'll pick some to read during WSBT News at 5.

  • Yes
  • No